// COMPARE · SCHEDULING

Buffer vs Loomly

Buffer is the simplest, cheapest scheduler — $6 per channel, a clean queue, and the smoothest solo experience. Loomly is collaboration-first: post previews, approval workflows, a shared calendar, and post ideas, on flat tiers that bundle accounts and users.

Last verified · 2026-05-29 · by Moe Ameen
The direct answer

Buffer is the simplest, cheapest scheduler — $6 per channel, a clean queue, and the smoothest solo experience. Loomly is collaboration-first: post previews, approval workflows, a shared calendar, and post ideas, on flat tiers that bundle accounts and users. Pick Buffer if you publish solo or in a tiny team. Pick Loomly if you route posts through client or manager sign-off. Neither generates the content itself.

Buffer and Loomly both queue posts across the major networks, but they solve different pains. Buffer strips scheduling down to a fast, clean queue priced per channel — ideal when one person owns publishing and just wants posts to go out on time. Loomly wraps scheduling in a collaboration layer: live post previews, structured approval workflows, a content calendar the whole team sees, and AI post ideas, all on flat tiers that bundle a dozen-plus accounts and multiple users.

The real question is whether posts need sign-off. If content moves straight from you to the feed, Buffer is cheaper and simpler. If a client or manager has to approve every post first, Loomly's workflow is worth the higher entry price.

Decision matrix: who wins for your use case

If you...PickWhy
I publish solo and just want a queueBufferBuffer's per-channel pricing and clean UI are the lightest, cheapest way to schedule alone.
Every post needs client or manager approvalLoomlyLoomly's approval workflow, roles, and live previews are built for sign-off before publish.
My budget is a few dollars a monthBufferBuffer Essentials starts at $6/channel; Loomly's lowest tier is $65/mo ($49 annual).
I manage 12+ accounts across several brandsLoomlyLoomly bundles 12 accounts and 3 users into one flat Starter tier; per-channel adds up fast on Buffer at that scale.
I want post previews and content ideas built inLoomlyLoomly shows live per-platform previews and suggests post ideas; Buffer's composer is more bare-bones.
I want the content generated, not just scheduledKompozyBoth are publish-only. Kompozy generates the posts, images, and video, then schedules across 9 platforms.
I need a fast link-in-bio landing page tooBufferBuffer bundles its Start Page link-in-bio builder; Loomly has no equivalent.

Feature comparison

Side-by-side capability map. Kompozy is included as the third option — most evaluators end up considering all three.

FeatureBufferLoomlyKompozy
Autopilot publishing~
RSS auto-ingest~
Webhook ingest~
AI clip detection
Animated captions
Auto-reframe to 9:16
AI avatar video
Multi-platform scheduling
Long-form writing
Brand voice system
Multi-brand workspaces
Bring-your-own-keys
Credit-based pricing

✓ = fully supported  ·  ~ = partial / limited  ·  — = not supported

Pricing

Buffer
  • FreeFree
  • Essentials$6/mo · per channel
  • Team$12/mo · per channel
Loomly
  • Starter$65/mo · 3 users · 12 accounts; $49/mo billed annually
  • Beyond$332/mo · unlimited users · 60 accounts; $249/mo billed annually
  • EnterpriseContact sales
Kompozy
  • Founding (BYO keys)$39/mo · Beta · closes 2026-08-31
  • Creator$49/mo
  • Pro$149/mo
  • Agency$399/mo

When to pick Kompozy instead

Buffer and Loomly disagree about how posts should be reviewed — but they agree you already wrote them. That is the expensive assumption. The weekly grind is producing 20-30 native posts across every platform, not moving them through a queue or an approval chain. Kompozy starts one step upstream: point it at a video, a blog, or an interview and it generates Persona Shorts, carousels, photo posts, quote graphics, and captions, governs them with one Persona Brief, runs them through a per-post review pipeline, and publishes across eight social platforms plus blog and email on autopilot. You get Loomly's review gate and Buffer's hands-off scheduling — on content the tool made for you.

Get started with Kompozy →

Frequently asked questions

Is Buffer or Loomly cheaper?

Buffer for small setups — $6/channel means a solo creator on 3 channels pays ~$18/mo. Loomly starts at $65/mo ($49 annual) but bundles 12 accounts and 3 users, so at a dozen-plus channels the flat tier can undercut Buffer's per-channel math.

Does Loomly have an approval workflow Buffer lacks?

Yes — approval workflows and roles are Loomly's signature feature, with live post previews and structured client/manager sign-off. Buffer has lightweight draft-and-approve but nothing as formal as Loomly's review chain.

Can either tool generate content with AI?

Both ship AI assistants for captions and post ideas, but neither produces finished video, carousels, or images, and neither replaces a content workflow. They stay publishing-first tools.

Which supports more social platforms?

Roughly comparable — both cover Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok, YouTube, X, Pinterest, and Threads. Buffer also ships a Start Page link-in-bio; Loomly adds RSS auto-drafting and a social inbox.

Which is better for an agency?

Loomly, on collaboration — approval flows, per-client calendars, and bundled seats fit agency review cycles. Buffer works for small agencies but its per-channel pricing and lighter workflow show their limits at scale.

← All comparisons · Migration guides · Get started →